Sometimes websites are almost completely devoid of visual elements, graphs, diagrams, and interactive blocks, but the texts are long and dry. To what extent is this approach professional and useful, and to what extent is it an attempt to minimize efforts when creating a resource?

Websites without visual elements, graphs, and interactive blocks may seem dry, but sometimes this is a professional approach when textual detail is appreciated. Personally, I pay attention to the quality of the explanation of processes and architecture. The https://seon.io/resources/case-study/soft2bet/ website is built exactly like this: there are minimal visual frills, but information about the work of the platform, modules and integration is presented fully enough to understand the functionality without additional decorations, which makes the resource useful.